2021-2022 Schedule

2021-2022 Schedule

Crisis, Uncertainty, and History: Trajectories and Experiences of Accelerated Change

Autumn 2021

Friday, September 10, 2021 – Roberto Barrios, Professor of Anthropology, University of New Orleans
“A Crisis for Whom? Epistemologies, Historiographies, and Praxis in Times of Upheaval”

Listen to the podcast:

Abstract:
In the case of Western European historiography, the origin of the crisis concept is often traced to Classical Greece, where it was used in the medical and legal fields to denote decision or a judgement. During the Middle Ages, the latter meaning of crisis as judgement lent itself to application in Christian teleological histories of salvation, with the Final Judgement being conceived as a crisis that would mark the transition between two qualitatively different temporalities: the history of humanity and the eternal utopia of the Kingdom of Heaven. This Christian Medieval meaning of crisis would eventually permeate 18th Century historiography, where the term came to describe critical moments of upheaval that marked transitions between different epochs, a meaning that endured in 19th Century evolutionary social theory. At the same time, crisis’ classical meaning as judgement is also commonly seen as the origin of the 18th Century Western European notion of critique. In 20th Century social science, this connection between crisis and critique resurfaced when a number of scholars came to see upheaval as a methodologically opportune moment that makes visible socio-political fault lines, contradictions, and structures that are more difficult to document during times of “normalcy.” Most notable among these scholars was Marshall Sahlins, who popularized the term crise révélatrice. But proponents of the revelatory merits of crises drew a modernist blindside as they assumed the vantagepoint for beholding a crisis was one that was informed by Marxist or political ecological theory, granting these analytical perspectives status as universally applicable transcendental critiques. Since the 1960s, post-structural deconstructions of Marxist analyses have helped us recognize the situatedness of Eurocentric social theory. In light of these contributions and in the context of global challenges such as anthropogenic climate change and the COVID 19 Pandemic, this presentation explores the following questions: If crises are, indeed, revelatory, what role does the beholder’s epistemological vantagepoint play in what is revealed to the observer? If crises are laden with the potential for social change, can they also bring about epistemological change and if so, for whom and how?

Professor Barrios is the author of Governing Affect: Neoliberalism and Disaster Reconstruction (Nebraska, 2017)

This talk is co-sponsored by the Department of Anthropology.


Friday, October 1, 2021 – Robin Wagner-Pacifici, University Professor of Sociology at the New School for Social Research
“Double Exposure: Pandemic and Protest in 2020”

Video of this presentation is not available.

Abstract:
This talk describes how time, space, and identity are reconfigured by the ruptures of historical events. It does so through a consideration of the intertwining of the Covid 19 pandemic and the social uprising against police violence targeting African-Americans in the United States. These ongoing intertwined ruptures have opened up a ‘double exposure,’ for a society riven by racism, disease, and inequality, an exposure that makes problematic conventional categories associated with events, like those of past and future and inside and outside. While we feel compelled to respond to these events, we simultaneously experience a crisis in our very categories of understanding the events, and in our relationships to them.

Professor Wagner-Pacifici is the author of What Is an Event? (Chicago, 2017)
This event is co-sponsored by the Ohio State University Office of Diversity


Friday, October 22, 2021 – Chad Wellmon, Univ. of Virginia and Paul Reitter, Ohio State Univ., in conversation with Ying Zhang, Ohio State Univ.
“Permanent Crisis: The Humanities in a Disenchanted Age”
 

Abstract:
The humanities, considered by many as irrelevant for modern careers and hopelessly devoid of funding, seem to be in a perpetual state of crisis, at the mercy of modernizing and technological forces that are driving universities towards academic pursuits that pull in grant money and direct students to lucrative careers. But as Paul Reitter and Chad Wellmon show, this crisis isn’t new—in fact, it’s as old as the humanities themselves.

Today’s humanities scholars experience and react to basic pressures in ways that are strikingly similar to their nineteenth-century German counterparts. The humanities came into their own as scholars framed their work as a unique resource for resolving crises of meaning and value that threatened other cultural or social goods. The self-understanding of the modern humanities didn’t merely take shape in response to a perceived crisis; it also made crisis a core part of its project. Through this critical, historical perspective, Permanent Crisis can take scholars and anyone who cares about the humanities beyond the usual scolding, exhorting, and hand-wringing into clearer, more effective thinking about the fate of the humanities. Building on ideas from Max Weber and Friedrich Nietzsche to Helen Small and Danielle Allen, Reitter and Wellmon dig into the very idea of the humanities as a way to find meaning and coherence in the world.


Friday, October 29, 2021 – Anna Tsing, Professor of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Cruz
“Is the Anthropocene amenable to historical analysis? Feral Atlas for historians”

Listen to the podcast:

Abstract:
The humanities, considered by many as irrelevant for modern careers and hopelessly devoid of funding, seem to be in a perpetual state of crisis, at the mercy of modernizing and technological forces that are driving universities towards academic pursuits that pull in grant money and direct students to lucrative careers. But as Paul Reitter and Chad Wellmon show, this crisis isn’t new—in fact, it’s as old as the humanities themselves.

Today’s humanities scholars experience and react to basic pressures in ways that are strikingly similar to their nineteenth-century German counterparts. The humanities came into their own as scholars framed their work as a unique resource for resolving crises of meaning and value that threatened other cultural or social goods. The self-understanding of the modern humanities didn’t merely take shape in response to a perceived crisis; it also made crisis a core part of its project. Through this critical, historical perspective, Permanent Crisis can take scholars and anyone who cares about the humanities beyond the usual scolding, exhorting, and hand-wringing into clearer, more effective thinking about the fate of the humanities. Building on ideas from Max Weber and Friedrich Nietzsche to Helen Small and Danielle Allen, Reitter and Wellmon dig into the very idea of the humanities as a way to find meaning and coherence in the world.

Anna Tsing is Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the Niels Bohr Professor at Aarhus University in Denmark, where she is the director of the Aarhus University Research on the Anthropocene. Tsing is the author of The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins (Princeton, 2015) and the co-creator of The Feral Anthropocene http://feralatlas.org/.

This event is co-sponsored by the Global Arts and Humanities Discovery Theme and the Department of Anthropology.


Friday, November 19, 2021 – Geoffrey Parker, Andreas Dorpalen Professor of European History and Associate of the Mershon Center, Ohio State University
and Adam Izdebski, Independent Research Group Leader, Palaeo-Science and History Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
“Climate Change, Crisis, and Resilience in The Pre-Modern World”

Listen to the podcast:

Abstract:
Human beings are never prepared for natural disasters. Wars, pandemics, recessions and climate change always seem to come as a surprise. We prefer to live in a comfortable present than prepare for an uncertain future. Historians have a duty to address this complacency and demonstrate that it is always better – and cheaper – to prepare than to repair.

Nevertheless the impact of disasters differs: some of those affected display resilience and mostly survive whereas others collapse and sometimes perish. Do terms like “resilience” and “collapse” do justice to the experience of humans in the past: did peasants care about collapsing states? What about non-human actors? What other narrative options exist?

Can modelling causality, employing mathematics, and investigating socio-environmental interactions and mechanisms offer a way forward? What questions should we ask and answer about policy-making for today and tomorrow?

Geoffrey Parker, Andreas Dorpalen Professor of European History and Associate of the Mershon Center, Ohio State University
and Adam Izdebski, Independent Research Group Leader, Palaeo-Science and History Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History


Spring 2022

Media & Materiality: Category Crisis and Transitional Moments in East Asia and Eastern Europe Symposium
Thursday, March 3rd – Saturday, March 5th, 2022

The language of “crisis” is pervasive in our neoliberal pandemic world, but the term is so capacious as to demand more rigorous scrutiny to become critically useful. The goal of our symposium is to theorize what crisis means at the level of lived experience, in the media and in the materialties that create historical subjectivities and relationalities. In other words, what happens when the mediated environments that we are enmeshed in are suddenly forced to function differently? When categories understood as structures (of feeling) and (medium) specificities come into question? Furthermore, if media and materialities mediate our experience, how do we account for media’s own crises at moments of historical shock? For example, what can we learn if we consider that the inflection point between socialism and postsocialism is also a moment in which film loses ground to video and data? How do we read a doubly critical crisis when the very thing that anchors us in specific historical life worlds changes at the same moment in which social structures shift? We are eager to untangle these interrelated meanings of crisis by turning to East Asia and Eastern Europe, two locales in which much of the 20th century was experienced as crisis and shock and whose careful study can help us develop historical methods and theoretical tools necessary to understand an age of crisis.

This event is cosponsored by the OSU Global Arts and Humanities Discovery Theme, the CHR, the Department of History, the East Asian Center, and the Slavic, East European and Eurasian Center.

Friday, January 21, 2022 – Michael Berry, Professor, Modern Chinese Literature and Film, UCLA;
“Translation Diary: Disinformation Campaigns, US-China Relations, and COVID19.”

 

Abstract:
Wuhan Diary by Fang Fang began as a blog which ran for sixty days from January 25 through March 25, 2020, documenting the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. The blog quickly became an online phenomenon, attracting tens of millions of Chinese readers. Wuhan Diary also provided an important portal for Chinese around the world to understand the outbreak, the local response, and how the novel coronavirus was impacting everyday people. The diary featured a curious mixture of quotidian details from Fang Fang’s daily routine under quarantine, medical insights from the author’s doctor friends, and brave observations about the official response. Eventually, Fang Fang’s account would become the target of a series of online attacks by “ultra-nationalists,” spawning debate about COVID-19, Sino-US Relations, and nature of civil society in China. As the English translator of Wuhan Diary, this lecture will alternate between first-hand insights from the translation process and broader observations on how the diary became a lightning rod for fierce political debate in China, ultimately hinting at the power of writing.

Author of A History of Pain: Trauma in Modern Chinese Literature and Film (New York, 2008).
Co-sponsored with the Institute of Chinese Studies.


Friday, February 11, 2022 – Jacob Soll, Professor and Professor of Philosophy, History and Accounting at the University of Southern California
“Crisis, Accounting, and Accountability in the French Revolution.”

Video of this presentation is not available.

Abstract:
There have been numerous attempts to explain the origins of the French Revolution, and the politics that took place during event. However, historians have ignored that a crisis in public finance and accounting was the central spark of the Revolution. Indeed, I discovered a trove of pamphlets that show just how focused French leaders and the public were on questions of accounting and accountability, and that, for the first years of the Revolution, attempts to improve accounting and public balance sheets were at the fore of the political actions of the first revolutionary governments. However, this was not an isolated event. Early modern Europe saw a number of political crises emerge over accounting and accountability so that we might see the two subjects as central to a useful approach in looking at the origins and mechanisms of financial and political crises in general.

Author of The Reckoning: Financial Accountability and the Rise and Fall of Nations (New York, 2014).


Friday, February 25, 2022 – Julia Keblinska, The East Asian/Slavic, East European and Eurasian CHR Crisis Post-Doctoral Fellow:
“Genres of Crisis: Cinema at the Brink of Postsocialism”

Video of this presentation is not available.

Abstract:
The lauded Polish art film of late socialism and the cinematic avant garde that emerges during the Chinese transition to postsocialism deal with the failure of the socialist project and in this talk stage a collapse of a certain generic expectations. These films mediate, and to a degree, “premediate” the looming crisis of historical transition that would rock both nations on June 4th, 1989. In the former case, the date marks Poland’s democratic elections that led to the dismantling of the socialist system, and in the latter, the Tiananmen massacre that violently reconfigured the future of Chinese socialism into neoliberal autocracy. Indeed the coevolution of these two June 4ths vis a vis the collapse of the Soviet Union is provocatively explored by perhaps the most well-known public intellectual of crisis, Naomi Klein, in The Shock Doctrine. In this talk, I consider the political and economic aesthetics described by Klein, but read these two postsocialist transitions comparatively through the forms and aesthetics of media that, quite simply, mediated them.

Scholarship on the “high culture fever” of early postsocialist China (1978-1989) repeatedly notes the significance of Polish texts, be they philosophical reconsiderations of socialist humanism or the “cinema of moral anxiety” (kino moralnego niepokoju) and absurdity that gave such doubts visual form. In the first part of the talk, I will show how the late socialist “high anxieties” of such elite texts manifest cinematically in director Huang Jianxin’s modernist oeuvre to repeatedly stage breakdowns and collapses across several genres (comedy, sci fi, noir) that Huang creatively infuses with the late socialist anxiety that suffused Polish film production of that period. I will then use Huang as a pivot away from a comparative reading of high registers into new territory that considers the importance of low genres, pulp cinema, circulated in both Poland and China on VHS to the consternation of both national film industries. Ultimately, I suggest that the explosion of multiple new genres on non-cinematic audiovisual media precipitates not only a crisis of socialist cinema in the face of new histories and new markets, but also creates postsocialist subjects who learn to navigate the political media ecologies of postsocialist transition by recourse to new generic modes.

Julia Keblinska earned her Ph.D. at UC Berkeley in 2021, in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures. Her dissertation is titled “New Era, New Media: The Postsocialist Chinese Media Ecology.”


Friday, March 25, 2022 – Stephen Kern, Humanities Distinguished Professor, Department of History, Ohio State University
Chris Otter, Department of History (commentator)
“Pace in the Internet Age”

 

Abstract:
Commentators judge that new speedy communication, transportation, and production technologies over the past forty years have created many unforeseen problems including unemployment, mental illness, alienation, addiction, and environmental degradation, problems that some interpret as crises. This paper traces dialectically the impact of these new accelerating technologies from 1880 to the present and shows how they also stimulated new thinking about and experiences of slower paces. It argues that a fuller understanding of an acceleration of experience should interpret how contrasting paces as faster or slower arise out of each other. The new technologies also increased choices for whatever pace was appropriate for many human needs, presto or adagio, that those increasing choices had positive existential value.